
Most stars who dare to be seen in public wearing fur eventually get an intimidating cease and desist letter from the animal-rights organization PETA. There are a few different paths celebrities can take after receiving said letter. There's the Aretha Franklin route, otherwise known as ignore-PETA-and-continue-to-leave-the-house-dripping-in-chinchilla-pelts route. If one is so inclined, one could follow the Beyoncé path of least resistance and stop wearing fur altogether. Or just do like Naomi Campbell -- tell PETA you'll stop wearing fur and then do it anyway.
And then there's the Kelis path, which is to take to your MySpace page and write an angry pro-carnivore, pro-fur letter to PETA and the world to read. The singer and new mother (and ardent consumer of animal products) was so offended by an unsolicited e-mail she recently received from the organization about her fur wearing that she fired off a post in which she called for the death of all rodents and asserts she would "eat pterodactyl if you found some and you told [her] it was meaty and delicious."
Kelis wrote that she draws the line at wearing skin or fur from endangered species but enjoys chinchilla and mink fur because "it's warm as hell and feels glorious."
Instead of worrying about animal rights, Kelis wrote, PETA should concern itself with underpaid minorities working on farms and international women's issues. Despite the weighty topics, Kelis also took a moment to briefly complain about the effect PETA's anti-fur campaign is having on the world of style.
"The death of high fashion," she wrote. "Ugh." Read her blog post in its entirety here.
UPDATE: PETA gave Black Voices exclusive access to the private e-mail message sent to Kelis on Jan. 12:
"Dear Kelis,
I hope that this finds you well. I'm writing today because we've been inundated with phone calls and e-mails from folks alerting us to photos of you wearing a fur hat and coat while out in London over the weekend.
Please know that animals killed for their fur endure immense suffering. Foxes, minks, coyotes, and rabbits -- and even dogs and cats -- are bludgeoned, strangled, genitally electrocuted and even skinned alive for their pelts. ...
If you enjoy the look of fur, renowned designers, including Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Stella McCartney, and Vivienne Westwood, couple fashion with compassion and use only faux fur in their lines. We hope you found this information helpful and will join countless celebrities, like Charlize Theron, Khloe Kardashian, Nia Long, Kid Sister, Pink, and Michelle Obama, in publicly swearing off fur. Thanks so much for your time and attention, and best wishes for a great 2010!"
The e-mail also included a link to an undercover video expose of fur farms narrated by Eva Mendes.
Now that you've heard both sides, who is right and who is wrong? Which side do you fall on in the fur debate?


Comments: (208)
Add a comment
By: Maggie on 1/19/2010 9:02AM
Fur was never meant to be inside out... animals don't wear it that way...
Report This
By: bennie on 1/19/2010 8:14AM
PETA is educating an ignorant,enjoy eating animal flesh, wearing fur that belongs on the animals that were born with it on to selfish humans who think animals are theirs for the asking. animals endure tremendous stress, pain, suffering and ultimate cruel deaths because of mankind. PETA AND OTHER A/R GROUPS GIVING YOU THE TOOLS TO BECOME A BETTER HUMAN BEING, ONES WITH A CONSCIENCE.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Dawn on 1/19/2010 8:27AM
PETA is not in the business of protecting animals. You all need to do some research. PETA and the HSUS kill more animals than any other organizations including your local government animal shelter. I don't wear fur; there are good alternatives but my shoes are made of leather.
Report This
By: Randy on 1/19/2010 8:18AM
I LOVE fur! There is NOTHING as soft a sheared beaver. Nothing as glorious as running your hand over mink. PETA kills more animals every year than the next two agencies combined then WASTES the meat and fur. Then they slam others for wearing fur. What a bunch of hypocrites! Give me meat! Give me leather to wear trimmed with real fur. I'd put my wife in a full length fur coat in an instant if I could afford it. I have every intention to buy a beaver pelt to put on my coats as a fur collar while in Alaska this Feb.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Terry on 1/19/2010 8:22AM
We need to start a secret "Anti PETA" organzation and use the same tactics that they use against them. It's time to take America back from scum like this.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Shirl Lavine on 1/19/2010 8:39AM
PETA has trod on the likes of many. Have they never heard of "live and let live."
Animal skins and pelts are as old as the begining of time. They should change their agenda to something something like helping underprivledge children. Their And so it is. Peace !
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Barter4bargains on 1/19/2010 8:46AM
Ok so you wear a synthetic fur thinking it is good for the animals good for the environment. Artificial fur is produced with chemicals in a lab. It kicks out pollutants into the air, during processing. Also a fake fur will only last a FEW seasons is NOT biodegradable. In fact highly toxic to the environment as it breaks down. Whereas a fur coat if properly stored can last generations in some cases a century plus!! Lets say the fur is not stored properly does not last for whatever reason. Once you dispose of it, it is biodegradable with NO harm to the environment. Most of the fur used for coats is farmed. Meaning in the natural environment that man has robbed on is diminishing. If left to the wild some of these animals would just be a footnote. Because of farming they are strong if we disappear there are enough of them to keep the species going enough of them to keep it diverse. As for me I do not wear new fur, but that is my choice(even when I could afford one.) I feel there are enough pelts out there to keep everyone warm. So I reconstruct real furs, fake furs. Anyone that tells you a fake fur is as warm as a real fur most likely never wore a real fur jacket. Therefore they have no idea what they are talking about. They are highly water resistant, they retain body heat, they retain shape fur does not get matted they are the high end of warmth function and style. Any jacket can last 20 mins to and hour but lets say your really outside for hours those with fake fur frost bite even under jacket, know why? They do not hold the body heat for an extended period of time. Those of us wearing real fur, no frost bite whatsoever, kind of why we are snow bunnies no matter the temp. Go to Canada or Alaska this conversion is mute because the name of the game is survival in the elements. And to those that do approach me while wearing fur with there propaganda. I state the facts. Listen it is ok to have a point of view. It is not ok to walk up to a stranger and rant like a loon throw red liquid or blood. In fact in this state you can be arrested for it. Assault and battery. You will have to make wearer whole. Meaning you have to replace a $1500-6000.00+ jacket. Trust me fur wearers have all the receipts and most jackets are custom made those you can add $1000-10,000+ to the cost of your folly. Could it be others are just jealous because they mimic the real deal. Could it be people are just jealous because some of these jackets can go for over 20,000+ a piece? Do these zealots even realize most of the money to protect endangered species come from those that can afford a real fur jacket & wear it? Not a wimpy 100.00 donation thousands of dollars. So when you bare bones it Peta is pissed donations have dropped. Because they have bit the hand that feeds them. So now it is shock ads and rants. You have the right to disagree with others. You do not have the right to go on a smear campaign. It might win over those that have the same point of view as you. But you will cut off the others that thought your cause was a cause not an agenda. Piss of fur wearers donations drop. Food for thought. Most that wear furs can afford to donate. If someone can spend 10,000 on a fur coat chances are they have spendable cash. Chances are they donate more than most of you earn a year. They just take that money and give it to another worthy cause. I am not among those that could even afford to buy a new fur coat. But I do know many that do and have. I have repaired furs for them. Here it is in a nutshell. You have a right to voice your views. They have a right to take there cash and go elsewhere. And they are!!!! Talk is cheap with Peta it is reduced to rants. Cash gets things done. Call it a quiet rebellion against Peta, as donations drop. Recycle your furs if you have them!! If not you can find craft cutters on Ebay. Most craft cutters are just coming apart at the seams. Because they are over 50 years old. The pelts are still soft pliable. But the threads are disintegrated.
So if you want to stop the demand for new fur but still want a fur. Why not use what we already have?
A craft cutter can run anywhere from 9.00-30.00. You will most likely have to put a few hours into the repair. But you will have a lovely jacket. Once your done with it sell it donate it. Resale on a repaired mink jacket 75-500. Resale on a repaired fox jacket the same as a mink. Resale on a Coyote repaired jacket 100-1000. Resale on a repaired lynx jacket 200-2000+. Keep in mind sometimes these repaired jackets can pull in thousands of dollars but I want a realistic price point for you. You want a soft pliable pelt. If it is not you can moisturize it. After all it is skin. You will have to moisturize it let it sit for a day go back. Repeat till the pelt is pliable again. So if your crafty can sew. Think about recycling furs. What your doing is stopping the demand for new pelts one wearer at a time.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Maggie on 1/19/2010 9:02AM
I'm so glad you took the time to write that, and I hope everybody reads it! Time for peta to give it up except for the fact that it's like everything else that starts out with high ideals and good intentions---after a bit it becomes only a money maker and that's what they're in it for...
Report This
By: barter4bargains on 1/19/2010 9:37AM
Maggie your so right!!!! At first it was of good intent. It is lost as you and other members have stated PETA is (killing) animals. Now it is just a money making machine using an agenda and bully tactics to cause a divide, thinking it will increase the bottom line. Because that is what it is about the bottom line now. A lot can be forgiven and has with PETA. But gassing innocent unwanted strays to keep the advertising budget up. Was a coffin nail more than smear tactics. Even new management will not save PETA. I clicked on Scott's link my heart sank. I am beyond disgust right now with PETA. So grateful to the town, because I work with them to save feral cats.(they are not easy to catch, not easy to tame. I bare the marks but I am proud to bare the marks) Not one of them goes into a kill shelter. And no one is making a red cent out of the deal no one is supplementing the cost to keep them happy and healthy. Our payment is something you cannot measure, cannot take to the bank. It is beyond priceless:) So yes I wear fur, I also do instead of lip service. Just like most of the members that are replying to the posts. They just have class do not want to boast about good deeds. Like you Maggie there are a lot of caring concerned people doing what they can when they can. People like you are the lifeblood that will keep others doing good deeds. Remember that:)
Report This
By: jerry on 1/19/2010 2:52PM
If Obama says not to wear fur - I'm buying my wife fur tomorrow.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Maggie on 1/19/2010 8:52AM
Maybe peta should be as concerned for the environment as much as they are animals.. their corporate offices in Norfolk are an eyesore on the waterfront! and energy used? a hell of a lot more than an animal farm. and I'll tell you something else... PETA KILLS ANIMALS WITH GAS!!!! Proof is the lady who went to Ahoskie (NC) animal clinic a few years ago and got animals and put them down with grossed out gas in the back of her station wagon. Yeah, that was nice. Get thee back from me peta! Your scare tactics are severe enough to warrant a "no fly" warning!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Carol on 1/19/2010 9:05AM
Never heard of Kelis and could care less about her. Anyone who doesn't care about the welfare of animals, is a phony about caring for the welfare of humans. Let her and others like her suffer the pain and torture innocent animals endure for her/their "pleasure". Hey Kelis, furs are expensive, how about wearing WARM furless coats and donate the money you save to indigent workers that you seem to be concerned about. PETA, keep up the good work.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: JOANNA on 1/19/2010 9:01AM
KELLIS??? NEVER HEARD OF HER.
THIS JUST SOUNDS LIKE AN EXCUSE FOR A PHOTO OP.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Kevin on 1/19/2010 9:05AM
PETA is just one in a long list of organizations -- Greenpeace, ELF, Common Cause, et al -- who use their 'causes' to tell others how to live their lives. At best, these "do-gooders" attempt to force their views on others. At worst, they are nothing more than totalitarian wannabes. Their hypocrisy is blatant and there for anyone to see. What I've always found interesting about these leftist groups, and those who agree with them, is they claim the "christian right" forces their views on everyone. Yet, it's the PETAs and those like them who destroy property and use coercion by force. All I have to say is we need more people like Kelis to stand up to these leftist lifestyle Nazis.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: redconvoy on 1/19/2010 9:08AM
It would be nice if PETA would put this much effort into saving people who are starving as well. No one seems to care about them! The supreme guy above may approve of them defending animals, but he is going to ask them what did they do for their fellow man at the same time? If any of you from PETA read this, you need to ask yourselves this question.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Babygirl on 1/19/2010 9:13AM
Does anyone know the way?
How sad! PETA has become just another divisive distraction from the real life issues that everyday humanity is facing. We are human beings; many of whom can't help but naturally follow the example of a loving Heavenly Father who clothed Adam and Eve, appropriately, with the skin of animals - once they themselves became ashamed of their own nakedness. I say, "appropriately", because (if we all just took a moment to meditate on the things of life - just to get some idea what we've all gone through to survive this far - what you'd discover is) how quickly man has gone from the way, being created in the image of God, Himself, to becoming the most savage of all beasts even amongst its own. The fact is, so many of us have become animals ourselves that it is us who need to be saved, yet, d-evil in it all [is] we are too divisively distracted to reach out - just for a moment - to minister salvation to the animalistic souls, again, so many have become. Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do. You, Lord God would have all be saved - every one of these and so many more - yet, my heart weeps for all who are caught up in this thing (this provision) - pointing fingers, hating, chaining one another (even moreso than the wild beasts of the field, as if we (ourselves) are the animals) when, in fact, clearly "man does not live by bread alone"; surely You, God, have given us "meat" to eat and Your word - Lord God - (every one that precedeth from Your mouth) is good for consumption. Moreover, surely, PETA can find some spare time for the people of Haiti, and from the sounds of some of these posts, so can we all. Meanwhile, this babygirl - Kelis - just happens to be right; so, we should all appreciate that she stands for our right to choose whether or not to be naked amongst our fellow man or be clothed in the provisions of God, Himself. Even so, I have so much love for all of you people - you have no idea - it has been alotted me discernment and that being so, the end result of this should be nothing but love, one for another. Though some of you could, clearly, use a spanking, many could get by with just a little timeout; while, the majority, well, let's just say a little tough love goes a long way as the beauty of it all is that God loves us everyone - the same - and has paved the way.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Babygirl on 1/19/2010 9:35AM
Does anyone know the way?
How sad! PETA has become just another divisive distraction from the real life issues that everyday humanity is facing. We are human
beings; many of whom can't help but naturally follow the example of a loving Heavenly Father who clothed Adam and Eve, appropriately, with the skin of animals - once they themselves became ashamed of their own nakedness. I say, "appropriately", because (if we all just took a moment to meditate on the things of life - just to get some idea
what we've all gone through to survive this far - what you'd discover is) how quickly man has gone from the way, being created in the image of God, Himself, to becoming the most savage of all beasts even amongst its own. The fact is, so many of us have become animals ourselves that it is us who need to be saved, yet, d-evil in it all [is] we are too divisively distracted to reach out - just for a moment - to minister salvation to the animalistic souls, again, so many have become. Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do.
You, Lord God would have all be saved - every one of these and so many more - yet, my heart weeps for all who are caught up in this thing (this provision) - pointing fingers, hating, chaining one
another (even moreso than the wild beasts of the field, as if we ourselves) are the animals) when, in fact, clearly "man does not live by bread alone"; surely You, God, have given us "meat" to eat and Your word - Lord God - (every one that precedeth from Your mouth) is good for consumption. Moreover, surely, PETA can find some spare time for the people of Haiti, and from the sounds of some of these posts, so can we all. Meanwhile, this babygirl - Kelis - just happens to be right; so, we should all appreciate that she stands for our right to choose whether or not to be naked amongst our fellow man or be clothed in the provisions of God, Himself. Even so, I have so
much love for all of you people - you have no idea - it has been alotted me discernment and that being so, the end result of this should be nothing but love, one for another. Though some of you
could, clearly, use a spanking, many could get by with just a little timeout; while, the majority, well, let's just say a little tough love goes a long way as the beauty of it all is that God loves everyone of us - the same - and has shown us the way. So, read the bible people (not as a crutch, for the weak, but as the loving and nurturing doctrine it is; which only the strong can uphold); you'd be surprised - it's in there.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Animal on 1/19/2010 9:42AM
PETA in their infinte stupidity also abuse animals or they want too. How about last year when they wanted to milk lactating women to discourage the milking of cows? I recall seeing dairy cattle bawling in pain after a barn fire. They were waiting to get milked and the milk was shooting out of their teats because the udders were overly full. The farmer and others were desperately working to set something up to milk the cattle. This shows PETA really knows very little about animals and what their actions might cause.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: c3momm on 1/19/2010 9:27AM
Don't even know who this girl is, but great reply to the peta NutJobs. People First! Eat Meat - It's what animals are for!!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: popswuzrite on 1/19/2010 9:32AM
Nobody's going to pay attention to a BLUE HAIRED has-been.
Reply to this Comment | Report This